Please LIKE and SHARE to get the latest UPDATES

 

 

 

TEA WITH THE MAD HATTER

Musings on Politics, The Tea Party, and America's Rampant Electile Dysfunction

NOW ON SALE

AT AMAZON

and

BARNES AND NOBLE

 

 

 And don't forget to check out

Available as a Trade Paperback or e-Book at

 

Amazon

B&N

This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Technology, Ideology and One Ridiculous Idea...

     

    Search the Site
    Follow me on Twitter
    « Sometimes a Not-So-Great Notion.... | Main | Greetings from Woodstock »
    Monday
    Jul082013

    Mean Democracy

    I’ve been troubled for some time about democracy; I just don’t think it means what it used to mean.

    Democracy is supposed to be about hearing, considering, and respecting multiple voices, resulting in reasoned compromise that leads to the overall betterment of society. Not today, though. Today democracy seems like just another cudgel, grabbed by the powerful and used to force a modern despotism on a helpless electorate. It has become a tool of convenience; we parade its benefits when it suits our needs, and we do so in ways that subvert its truth. Demokratia, the rule of the people, is used by those who, wielding a bastardized definition, pretend that democracy is a power given to individuals rather than a loan given to representatives.

    While I may be unsure of what the word means today, I do know one thing: the practice of democracy has gotten mean. In North Carolina, for example (a part of the country we should all be paying extremely close attention to), democracy no longer rides the rails at all. The state legislators down there seem to have adapted the modern definition and are busy horse-whipping the populace into submission. (If you don’t believe me, take a look at this video, in which the NC Lt. Governor tells the concerned gallery occupants that they can’t make either sound or gesture. This, he seemingly contends, is how democracy works on his watch.) Instead of representing their constituents, the current supermajority appears to have taken the electoral victory as an opportunity to remake the state in their own image rather than finding ways to compromise for the betterment of the state’s diverse population.

    Such plays out all over the country. Fear and enmity have combined with Torquemadan tactics to create an environment that seems anything but democratic to me.  Instead, democracy is what someone else decides it is; democracy is whatever the winners want it to be.

    And our attitude has gone international. I’ve written previously about the Egyptian elections and how we seem to have conveniently forgotten that they were in fact just that: elections. Now there are those who laud what we used to deplore: the military ousting an elected head of state and then taking over the country.

    In my day we called that a “coup.”  But not today.  A quick search for references to the events in Egypt reveals an abundance of counter-coup claims; apparently, use of the term would violate U.S. foreign policy and impact our ability to provide aid to Egypt. And since we sort of like the results (After all, they got rid of the Muslim Brotherhood!) we wouldn’t want to take that risk. So it’s not a coup, even though “leading voices in Washington contend that it is the security interest of the U.S. and the region to help loosen the grip the Muslim Brotherhood has over Egypt and assist in holding a new set of democratic elections.”

    Apparently the last set of democratic elections didn’t provide the outcome we want.

    And it’s all connected. It seems like no accident that, at the same time that we willfully turn a blind eye to democracy’s overthrow in Egypt, we are also using democracy’s bludgeon to legislate against the non-existent threat of Sharia law here at home.  For proof, look no further than (once again) to our friends in North Carolina, who have chosen to join more than two dozen other states in wasting time on this “threat.”

    Is this really what democracy is for? And, if not, how can it change?

    Perhaps we should start with those few legislators who somehow still care, who try not to see only through a glass, darkly. Currently too many are playing the game the bludgeoners want them to play, catering to the lies and misinformation with counter-arguments that they know will only fall on deaf ears. Perhaps, instead, they should call out the hypocrisy. In North Carolina, for example, in the recent floor debates shown in this video, why is it that not one defiant legislator stood up to call out the bill supporters, to dare them to admit what they are really trying to do? Why do they only play the game of punch-counterpunch when the real issues of fear-mongering and theocracy are never addressed? Can you imagine what would happen if just one legislator bothered to stand up and speak the real truth, to ask just this one question: “Have you all gone fucking nuts?”

    Let’s find those legislators, both at the state and federal levels. Let’s encourage them, give them cover, offer them reportage and support. Let’s urge them to stop struggling in an environment that ignores democracy; urge them instead to call out what’s really happening, and to force those who would suppress us by pretending to democracy admit instead what they’re really trying to do.

    And what they’re trying to do is about the farthest thing from democracy I can imagine.

    PrintView Printer Friendly Version

    EmailEmail Article to Friend

    References (2)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do declare the following… Followed by a series of statements in ...
    • Response
      - Chasing Glenn Beck - Mean Democracy

    Reader Comments (2)

    I had to stop watching the video of the North Carolina legislative consideration of new abortion restrictions for two reasons:
    1) I am completely outraged that not one legislator speaking against the new bill stood up to the bully Lt Governor who was outrageously disrespectful to the citizens in the gallery. Certainly these legislators understood that he was using his gavel to to disrupt their testimony as well as to threatening the audience with removal sound, gestures,nor any other suspicious movements. Clearly the Lt Governor has forgotten who he works for, and presumes that once elected, legislators are the uncontested representatives of the people, who by voting apparently gave up all rights to speak, look or signal for themselves.
    2) the total lack of a clear rebuttal to those speaking in favor of the new law, who justified their position by citing one rare case of illegal actions by a abortion clinic doctor (who was investigated, tried, and found guilty, meaning less restrictive laws worked the way they were supposed to - they worked to eliminate an unsafe clinic -although note that if there had been more abortion services available, most of this clinic's patients would have gone somewhere else.) and the claim of widespread sex-selection abortions ( could I see the evidence of this please?). All smoke and mirrors on the part of the anti-abortion crowd (who can't decide if they are more offended by the immorality of the immortality of abortion or the supposed unfair tax burden poor women's abortion puts on the taxpayer). The anti abortion legislators' argument was the equivalent of saying that because one obnoxious Lt Governor abused his power in "keeping order" during a legislative session, that we should pass a law that severely restricts the ability of all future LT governors from demanding order in the gallery, no matter the acts of disturbance. The logic is flawed, the evidence so thin and irrelevant that the argument fails to meet the most simplistic standards of productive discourse. Yet no one seems to be able to call it for what it is.

    These two reasons lead me share the writers sense of confusion regarding the type of "democracy" we practice in this country. What is even more disturbing - so many Americans don't seem to realize how bad it is. I get the temptation felt by citizens to oust the career "politicians" and elect "regular folk" into office. But for God's sake, recognize that elected leaders ought to have a moderate level of intelligence. I truly think we are working our way into a new Dark Ages, but this time one that feeds into the interests of corporate America and the Rich instead of the church. After all, it is much easier to control people who are not trained in critical thinking, who distrust "intellectuals" and who have allowed those in power to manipulate fears in such a way that folks are willing to accept the exploitation and scapegoating of others as a means of believing they are safe from the same treatment towards themselves. History is full of atrocities done to the minority groups with the acquiescence of the majority, who embrace the justification that the minorities somehow deserve their lot. Time and time again the majority have hidden huddled behind their locked doors, telling themselves that bad things only happen to bad people, and since they are. It " one of the others", the are safe. Then, perhaps 50 years later, they come together and promise never again. At least not until the next time, when the process starts anew. As a people we don't seem to learn from our mistakes we only perfect them.

    July 13, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterRhonda Ovist

    " I truly think we are working our way into a new Dark Ages, but this time one that feeds into the interests of corporate America and the Rich instead of the church. After all, it is much easier to control people who are not trained in critical thinking, who distrust "intellectuals" and who have allowed those in power to manipulate fears in such a way that folks are willing to accept the exploitation and scapegoating of others as a means of believing they are safe from the same treatment towards themselves."

    Absolutely right; couldn't have said it better myself. MC

    July 14, 2013 | Registered CommenterMichael Charney

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>